ICD-10 medical coding

A distilled clinical-coding specialist from the Pareta fleet. Send a clinical note through the same model:"auto" endpoint you use for everything else — Pareta routes it to the specialist, constrains the output to valid codes, and verifies before serving.

106% of GPT-5.5 accuracy on ICD-10 coding (micro-F1)
138× lower cost than the same GPT-5.5 baseline
JSON out codes returned as structured output, constrained at decode time — not parsed from prose
$0.05 / $0.10 per 1M input / output tokens — a typical chart codes for a fraction of a cent · pricing

No integration beyond the one you already have

There is no separate coding API to learn. The same two-line change that puts you on Pareta serves coding too:

completion = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="auto",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": chart_note + "\n\nCode this encounter (ICD-10-CM)."}],
)
Don't take the benchmark's word for it. Upload your own de-identified charts in the dashboard and run the same evaluation we run — your data, our specialist, frontier models side by side, scored identically.
Start free →
Accuracy measured on Pareta benchmark runs, July 2026, on the production serving path customers call. micro-F1 vs GPT-5.5 on the same items. Frontier cost = usage tokens × vendor list price; Pareta = actual metered billing.